{"id":736,"date":"2026-10-02T01:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-10-02T01:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mancheyu.com\/?p=736"},"modified":"2026-09-23T04:11:07","modified_gmt":"2026-09-23T04:11:07","slug":"oem-vs-aftermarket-engine-parts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mancheyu.com\/es\/oem-vs-aftermarket-engine-parts\/","title":{"rendered":"OEM frente a piezas de motor de posventa y la evidencia detr\u00e1s de cada reclamo"},"content":{"rendered":"

Comparing OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> is often reduced to a simple question: which one is better? For heavy truck engine repairs, that question is too broad to support a reliable purchasing decision. \u201cOEM\u201d describes a relationship to the original equipment channel, while \u201caftermarket\u201d covers a much wider group of independently supplied replacement parts. Neither label, by itself, proves the exact fit, material, machining condition, included components, inspection history, or suitability of one specific part.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A better comparison of OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> starts with evidence. Buyers should ask what proves the identity of the part, what proves fitment to the engine, what technical information is available, which inspections apply to the actual component, and what exactly will be supplied. This matters even more for cylinder heads, pistons, liners, piston pins, crankshafts, oil pumps, engine blocks, and engine assemblies, where small differences can affect installation and repair outcomes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What OEM Means in an Engine Parts Purchase<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\"Culata<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

In an engine-parts transaction, OEM is commonly used to describe a replacement part associated with the original equipment manufacturer’s parts channel or specification system. However, the word is frequently used loosely in online listings and quotations. A supplier writing \u201cOEM number\u201d may simply be providing a cross-reference. That does not automatically prove that the quoted part was produced for, supplied through, or authorized by the original equipment channel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When comparing OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong>, treat \u201cOEM\u201d as a claim that should have a defined meaning. Ask whether the statement refers to the part’s brand identity, its original application reference, its production source, its design specification, or simply a reference number used for matching.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A reference number is extremely useful for fitment research, but a number alone should not be treated as proof of origin. The purchasing file should separate two questions: \u201cWhat engine or application does this reference correspond to?\u201d and \u201cWhat evidence supports the claimed source of the supplied part?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What Aftermarket Means and Why the Category Is So Broad<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Aftermarket engine parts are replacement components sold outside the original vehicle manufacturer’s service-parts channel. That definition covers many different sourcing models. Some replacements are engineered for a specific application with documented dimensions and inspection requirements. Others may be generic, poorly documented, or based mainly on visual similarity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This variation is why an OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> comparison cannot stop at the category name. An aftermarket crankshaft with clear application data, dimensional documentation, material information, and inspection records gives a buyer more to evaluate than an untraceable part described only as \u201ccompatible.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The reverse is also true: an OEM label should not eliminate normal receiving inspection. Shipping damage, incorrect reference selection, incomplete supply scope, or a catalog mismatch can still create problems even when the source is legitimate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Do Not Use a Reference Number as Proof of OEM Identity<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

One of the most important rules when evaluating OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> is to separate reference numbers from source claims. A supplier may list an original reference because it helps buyers identify the application. That does not mean the replacement part itself is an original-channel component.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, a cylinder head quotation may show an application reference that matches the old head. This is useful for the matching process. To establish the identity of the supplied part, however, the buyer should review the actual product label, packaging identification, supplier documentation, traceability information, and any other evidence relevant to the claim being made.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This distinction protects both sides. Buyers can use cross-references to find replacements without misclassifying the product, while suppliers can describe compatible parts accurately without turning an application reference into an unsupported origin statement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fitment Should Be Proven Separately From Part Category<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The most important practical question in OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> is often not which category the part belongs to, but whether it is correct for the exact engine being repaired.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fitment should be checked from the complete engine code, old-part reference, physical interfaces, relevant dimensions, photographs, and any application-specific technical information. An original-channel part with the wrong engine variant is still the wrong part. An aftermarket part that has not been adequately matched also creates risk, even if the listing claims broad compatibility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The site’s engine parts catalog<\/a> includes cylinder heads, pistons, liners, piston pins, crankshafts, oil pumps, engine blocks, and engine assemblies. Each product family needs a different fitment review. Buyers should avoid one universal rule for every component.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Producto<\/th>\nKey Fitment Evidence<\/th>\nDo Not Rely On Alone<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Cabezal<\/td>\nEngine code, head reference, casting marks, ports, mounting faces<\/td>\nOverall appearance or one casting number<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Pist\u00f3n<\/td>\nEngine identity, piston reference, bore relationship, pin and ring details<\/td>\nOverall external dimensions<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Forro del cilindro<\/td>\nEngine identity, liner type, relevant diameters, length and flange details<\/td>\nBore size alone<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cig\u00fce\u00f1al<\/td>\nReference, journal dimensions, stroke, front and rear interfaces<\/td>\nEngine family name alone<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bomba de aceite<\/td>\nReference, drive, mounting pattern, inlet and outlet arrangement<\/td>\nHousing shape from one photo<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Conjunto de motor<\/td>\nComplete engine variant, control system, mounts, transmission and connections<\/td>\nSeries name or exterior appearance<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n

Compare Materials and Manufacturing Claims With Documents<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Material descriptions are frequently used in OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> marketing, but broad phrases such as \u201cpremium alloy,\u201d \u201chigh-strength material,\u201d or \u201cOEM-grade metal\u201d do not tell a technical buyer enough.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Where material matters to the purchase specification, ask what information can be supplied for the component being quoted. Depending on the product, that could include a material specification, hardness record, heat-treatment information, chemical composition report, or supplier-controlled drawing requirement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Not every purchase requires a full material certificate. The level of evidence should reflect the component, failure consequence, customer requirement, and purchasing agreement. The key is to avoid treating descriptive marketing language as if it were a verified engineering specification.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Machining Quality Matters More Than Surface Appearance<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Engine parts often depend on machined interfaces that cannot be evaluated accurately from a catalog photograph. In an OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> comparison, dimensions, tolerances, geometry, and surface condition may matter far more than paint color or visual finish.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A crankshaft requires correct journal geometry and interfaces. A piston depends on its designed dimensional relationship with the liner, pin, and rings. A cylinder head relies on machined faces, passages, valve-related features, and multiple installation interfaces. An oil pump depends on its drive and port arrangement in addition to its housing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When dimensional evidence is required, measurements should be made with suitable instruments and a defined method. The NIST information on metrological traceability<\/a> explains why measurement results are more meaningful when they can be related to references through a documented calibration chain. For a purchasing decision, the important point is simple: a number without a clear measuring basis is weaker evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Inspection Records Should Apply to the Actual Product<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\"Componentes<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Inspection evidence is another area where OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> comparisons can become vague. A supplier may describe a general quality-control process, but the buyer should understand whether any provided record relates to the actual part, production batch, or product family being purchased.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For critical or high-value components, useful records may include dimensional inspection, identification photographs, non-destructive testing where applicable, material information, or other product-specific checks. The exact requirement depends on the component.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A quality-management certification can support confidence in the supplier’s process controls, but it is not a substitute for product-level fitment or inspection evidence. The ISO overview of ISO 9001<\/a> describes a process-based quality-management framework. It does not certify that one specific crankshaft, piston, or cylinder head fits a particular engine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Traceability Helps Verify What You Actually Received<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Traceability becomes especially valuable when OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> are sourced in repeated batches. A distributor or fleet buyer may need to know which shipment, production batch, supplier record, or inspection document corresponds to a delivered component.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Useful traceability can include a part label, batch or lot reference, packing identification, inspection record number, purchase-order line, and receiving photographs. The goal is not to create paperwork for its own sake. It is to preserve a link between the physical part and the purchasing evidence used to approve it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When a later issue appears, traceability helps determine whether the affected parts came from one shipment, one batch, one engine application, or a broader supply group. Without that link, technical investigation becomes much slower.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pentru echipe de cump\u0103rare, OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> should always be compared on equivalent supply scope.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Compare Supply Scope Before Comparing the Two Categories<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A major source of confusion in OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> purchasing is unequal supply scope. One cylinder-head quotation may cover a bare head while another includes valves and other fitted components. One piston quote may be for the piston only while another may contain related items. An engine assembly can vary even more widely in included external components.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Before deciding that one option is more complete, create an included-and-excluded list. Compare the quotations line by line.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Comparison Area<\/th>\nEvidence to Request<\/th>\nQuestion to Resolve<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Identity<\/td>\nPart reference, label, source documentation<\/td>\nWhat exactly is being claimed?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fitment<\/td>\nEngine code, application data, interface comparison<\/td>\nDoes it match this exact engine?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Material\/specification<\/td>\nAvailable technical documents<\/td>\nWhat requirement is the part made to?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Inspection<\/td>\nProduct or batch records where required<\/td>\nWhat was actually checked?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Alcance de la oferta<\/td>\nIncluded\/excluded list<\/td>\nAre the quotations for the same configuration?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Traceability<\/td>\nBatch, label, packing and record links<\/td>\nCan the delivered part be linked to its records?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fitment support<\/td>\nMatching review and open-point list<\/td>\nWhat remains unconfirmed before ordering?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n

Aftermarket Does Not Describe One Quality Level<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The aftermarket category ranges from highly documented replacement components to parts with very limited technical information. Therefore, an OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> comparison should never treat every aftermarket option as equivalent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A buyer can create a minimum evidence threshold instead. Require the full application reference, technical dimensions relevant to fitment, supply scope, inspection documentation where necessary, traceability, and clear handling of any unresolved points.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This approach is more useful than relying on labels because it can be applied consistently across suppliers and component families. A well-documented replacement can be evaluated. A poorly documented one leaves the buyer with assumptions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Use Failure Consequence to Decide How Much Evidence You Need<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Not every engine part requires the same purchasing review. When comparing OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong>, the level of verification should increase when replacement is difficult, labor-intensive, expensive to repeat, or capable of causing wider engine damage if the part is wrong.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A crankshaft, cylinder head, engine block, or complete engine assembly usually justifies more pre-order evidence than a simple low-risk accessory. Internal components that require major teardown to access also deserve careful fitment confirmation because a mismatch can create significant workshop rework.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This does not mean every critical part must automatically be sourced through one category. It means the documentation and approval process should reflect the consequence of getting the decision wrong.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Commercial requirements can also change how OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> are approved for a fleet or repair program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Check Whether the Engine Is Still Under a Warranty or Contract Requirement<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Commercial engines may be subject to warranty terms, fleet maintenance agreements, insurance requirements, or customer purchasing rules. These conditions can affect an OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> decision independently of technical fitment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Before ordering, buyers should review the actual warranty or contract language applicable to the vehicle and jurisdiction. Do not rely on a general online statement that one category always preserves or always voids warranty coverage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If a fleet customer specifically requires original-channel parts, record that requirement in the RFQ. If documented alternatives are allowed, define what technical and quality evidence the customer requires before approval.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Use Part Matching Evidence for Cylinder Heads<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Cylinder heads are a good example of why OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> cannot be decided from a label alone. The buyer still needs to match the complete engine code, head reference, casting marks, mounting faces, ports, injector-related features, and required assembly state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

La gu\u00eda en identificaci\u00f3n de culata<\/a> explains how engine-plate information, cast and stamped numbers, multi-angle photos, and physical interfaces can be combined into a practical matching package.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Whether the proposed head is original-channel or aftermarket, the same fitment questions remain. In addition, the buyer must confirm whether the quotation is for a bare or fitted head and which components are included.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Use Dimensional Evidence for Pistons and Liners<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\"Seis<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

For pistons and liners, an OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> decision should include dimensional and configuration matching. The piston, liner, rings, and pin work as a system, and overall external dimensions are not enough to confirm compatibility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Review the engine code, piston reference, bore relationship, compression height, pin dimensions, ring arrangement, liner type, and repair size where applicable. The previous guide on coincidencia de pist\u00f3n y forro<\/a> provides a structured way to organize those checks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If an aftermarket piston is proposed against an original reference, the cross-reference is only the beginning. The buyer should still verify the technical characteristics that matter for the actual rebuild.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For internal engine components, OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> should be reviewed against the same measurable fitment evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Use Inspection Evidence for Crankshafts<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Crankshafts require their own OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> evaluation. A correct reference should be supported by journal dimensions, stroke, front and rear interfaces, and applicable inspection evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If a replacement crankshaft is being purchased after a failure, preserve the old shaft’s measurements and repair history. The gu\u00eda de inspecci\u00f3n del cig\u00fce\u00f1al<\/a> explains how journal condition, taper, out-of-round, runout, critical areas, and previous machining can be documented before a rebuild decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This information can also be used to check whether the quoted replacement corresponds to the required standard size and configuration rather than simply sharing a broad engine-family description.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Do Not Let Product Photos Decide the Purchase<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Product photos are valuable for OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> because they can reveal ports, mounting holes, casting shapes, connectors, and supplied accessories. But they should be treated as identification evidence, not a complete specification.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Photographs may show optional components, a sample configuration, or an earlier production version. The actual quotation should state the part reference and supply scope in writing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When a photo is used for matching, compare it with the buyer’s old part from the same angles. Mark important interfaces rather than relying on a general \u201clooks the same\u201d judgment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Create a Supplier Evidence Checklist Instead of a Label Based Rule<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

A practical way to manage OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> is to use the same evidence checklist for every proposed component. This keeps purchasing decisions consistent and reduces the influence of vague marketing claims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The checklist can ask for part identity, application, fitment basis, relevant technical specification, included components, inspection evidence, traceability, packaging identification, and any unresolved technical points. For claimed OEM parts, add evidence supporting the source claim. For aftermarket parts, ask what specification or application basis supports the replacement claim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The resulting comparison becomes more useful because each option is evaluated through visible evidence rather than a category stereotype.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

How Distributors and Fleet Buyers Can Standardize Approval<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Distributors and fleet operators buying repeated engine parts can turn the OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> framework into an internal approval process. Start by defining what information is mandatory for each product family.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, cylinder heads may require engine code, reference, casting images, supply scope, and specified inspection documents. Crankshafts may require journal and interface information. Engine assemblies may require the full variant, ECU and harness requirements, transmission interface, accessories, and shipment inspection records.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Approved records should be saved with the supplier quotation and purchase order. On repeat orders, the buyer can confirm that the new shipment still matches the approved specification instead of restarting from a product name alone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A documented comparison makes OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> easier to approve consistently across repeat orders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Questions to Ask Before Approving Either Option<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Antes de aprobar OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong>, the purchasing team should be able to answer a few core questions in writing. What exactly is the quoted part? What supports its claimed identity? What evidence connects it to the engine? Which technical characteristics have been confirmed? What components are included? What inspection evidence is available? Can the delivered item be traced back to the quotation and records?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If any of these questions remain open, record the issue rather than assuming the answer. A technically clear open point is easier to solve before shipment than after installation begins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For mixed engine-part requirements, use the lista de verificaci\u00f3n de RFQ de piezas de motor<\/a> to organize engine information, part references, quantities, photographs, and required documents before requesting a quotation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Before final purchasing approval, keep the OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> evidence with the RFQ and supplier response.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What to Send for an Engine Parts Matching Review<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\"Cig\u00fce\u00f1al<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

If you are comparing OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> for a heavy truck repair, send the complete engine code, old-part reference, clear photos, relevant dimensions, required quantity, and required supply configuration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For a cylinder head, include head markings and interface photos. For pistons and liners, include the matching dimensions and repair status. For a crankshaft, include journal and connection information. For an engine assembly, include the engine plate, installation interfaces, and required accessories.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

You can send these details through the p\u00e1gina de contacto<\/a> for a matching review. Keep source claims, fitment confirmation, and supply scope as separate fields so each can be checked independently.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For repeat purchasing, OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> should be reviewed with the same evidence standard each time. That consistency makes supplier changes, batch reviews, and technical approvals easier to document.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For mixed orders, OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> should also be separated by line item so identity, fitment, inspection records, and included components remain traceable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusi\u00f3n<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The useful question behind OEM vs aftermarket engine parts<\/strong> is not which label is universally better. It is which specific part can be supported by enough evidence for the repair being performed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Original-channel identity should be supported rather than inferred from a reference number. Aftermarket replacements should be evaluated from their application data, dimensions, manufacturing information, inspection evidence, traceability, and supply scope. Both categories still require correct fitment to the exact engine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For professional engine-parts purchasing, evidence is the common language. When buyers compare identity, fitment, specification, inspection, traceability, and included components in the same structured way, the decision becomes clearer and the risk of ordering the wrong part is reduced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Preguntas frecuentes<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

What is the main difference between OEM vs aftermarket engine parts?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

OEM generally refers to parts associated with the original equipment service channel or specification system, while aftermarket parts are supplied outside that channel. The categories describe sourcing relationships, but they do not by themselves prove fitment, condition, or quality of a specific component.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Does an OEM part number prove that a supplied part is OEM?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

No. An OEM reference can be used to identify an application or cross-reference a replacement. The identity and source of the supplied part should be supported by the actual product documentation, labels, packaging, traceability, and supplier evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Are aftermarket engine parts always lower quality?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

No. Aftermarket is a broad category with different manufacturing and documentation levels. Evaluate the specific replacement using fitment data, technical specifications, inspection evidence, traceability, and supplier support rather than assuming one quality level for the entire category.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What evidence should I request when comparing OEM vs aftermarket engine parts?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Request the proposed part reference, fitment basis, relevant dimensions or technical specifications, supply scope, product-specific inspection documents where required, and traceability information. If an OEM identity is claimed, ask what documentation supports that claim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Which engine parts need the most careful comparison?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Parts with complex fitment, major labor requirements, or high failure consequences deserve especially careful review. Cylinder heads, pistons and liners, crankshafts, oil pumps, engine blocks, and complete engine assemblies should all be matched using product-specific evidence rather than a category label alone.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Comparing OEM vs aftermarket engine parts is often reduced to a simple question: which one is better? For heavy truck engine repairs, that question is too broad to support a reliable purchasing decision. \u201cOEM\u201d describes a relationship to the original equipment channel, while \u201caftermarket\u201d covers a much wider group of independently supplied replacement parts. Neither […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":395,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","rank_math_title":"OEM vs Aftermarket Engine Parts for Heavy Truck Repairs","rank_math_description":"Compare OEM vs aftermarket engine parts by fitment, inspection, traceability and supply scope before approving a heavy truck engine repair order.","rank_math_canonical_url":"","rank_math_focus_keyword":"OEM vs aftermarket engine parts"},"categories":[1],"tags":[48,42,56,76,78,77],"class_list":["post-736","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","tag-engine-parts-matching","tag-engine-parts-sourcing","tag-heavy-truck-engine-parts","tag-oem-vs-aftermarket-engine-parts","tag-parts-quality-control","tag-replacement-engine-parts"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mancheyu.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/736","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mancheyu.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mancheyu.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mancheyu.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mancheyu.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=736"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/mancheyu.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/736\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":737,"href":"https:\/\/mancheyu.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/736\/revisions\/737"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mancheyu.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/395"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mancheyu.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=736"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mancheyu.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=736"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mancheyu.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=736"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}